Golf Top Stories & Leaderboard
GOLF SCORING ZONE
Leaderboard - The Open Championship
Oosthuizen making a name for himself at Old Course
By DOUG FERGUSON
Associated Press
![]()
ST. ANDREWS, Scotland – The name on his passport – Lodewicus Theodorus – sounds like it belongs in a Wagner opera.
His nickname among friends – Shrek – is not much better.
Louis Oosthuizen found a better way to make a name for himself Friday at St. Andrews, where he carefully navigated the Old Course through light wind and short spells of rain for a 5-under 67 to take the early lead in the British Open.
A long putt through the Valley of Sin on the 18th hole, and the birdie putt from just inside 15 feet that followed, put the 27-year-old South African at 12-under 132. He was three shots clear of Rory McIlroy, who had to face increasing wind in the afternoon.
“It’s probably the position anyone wants to be in playing a major on the weekend,” Oosthuizen said.
It’s a position he doesn’t know very well.
Oosthuizen (WUHST’-hy-zen) had played eight majors when he arrived at St. Andrews. He missed the cut in seven of them, the exception coming in the 2008 PGA Championship at Oakland Hills, where he finished last.
“It wasn’t very great, was it?” said Oosthuizen, flashing the gap-tooth grin that earned him the Shrek moniker. “It was a matter of not believing in myself, I think. Everyone around here is telling me, ‘You’ve got the shots, you’re playing well.’ And again, that win earlier this season just got my mind set in a different way.”
He won his first European Tour event in Spain this spring, his fourth victory worldwide.
The South African most would have expected atop the leaderboard was Ernie Els, and in a way, Els was a part of this. If not for the Ernie Els Foundation in South Africa, Oosthuizen might not be at St. Andrews, or anywhere in golf.
Oosthuizen comes from a tennis-mad family, but quickly switched to golf when he put a club in his hand. The trouble came with finances, for the travel required to develop his game proved to be too much for the son of a farmer. That was about the time the Ernie Els & Fancourt Foundation began to identify young South Africans from families of limited resources.
He was 17 when he began with the foundation, leaving when he turned pro.
“It was unbelievable what he did for me, traveling around the country, helping with expenses, things like that,” Oosthuizen said. “He’s such a good mentor. And probably without him, those three years I’ve been in his foundation, I wouldn’t have been here.”
Els identified talent, all right.
Oosthuizen teamed with Charl Schwartzel to win the 2000 World Junior Team Championship. Two years later on his home course at Mossel Bay Club along the famed Garden Route, he shot a 57.
That was great pressure knowing what was at stake, even though he was playing with friends. Oosthuizen needed to birdie one of the last three holes for a 59, and instead he chipped in for eagle on the 17th and birdied the last.
Now comes more pressure, and he appears up for it.
“I like the way he’s playing right now,” said his longtime caddie, Zach Rasego, who talks strategy on every tee in Afrikaans with Oosthuizen. “He doesn’t get frustrated by anything.”
The start of his back nine could have gone different directions.
Oosthuizen drove the par-4 10th green for a two-putt birdie, only to three-putt the next green for a bogey. After a chip-and-putt birdie on the 12th, he came up woefully short on the 13th and couldn’t get up-and-down for par.
He never looked flustered. And he never gave up on his plan.
Oosthuizen can bash it out there with the best of them, yet even with a breeze at his back, he laid back in the fairway on the 15th and 16th holes, playing longer irons into the green.
“I’m trying to take the bunkers completely out of play,” he said. “Seeing Tiger … I don’t think he went in one bunker. To me, if you go in a bunker, that’s a bogey or it’s going to be a very good par. So I’ve got that strategy.”
| Add | Pos | Start | Player Name | Overall | Today | Thru | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | Total | |
![]() |
1. | 1 | Oosthuizen, Louis | ![]() |
-16 | -1 | 18 | 65 | 67 | 69 | 71 | 272 |
![]() |
2. | 4 | Westwood, Lee | ![]() |
-9 | -2 | 18 | 67 | 71 | 71 | 70 | 279 |
![]() |
3. | 2 | Casey, Paul | -8 | +3 | 18 | 69 | 69 | 67 | 75 | 280 | |
![]() |
3. | 12 | McIlroy, Rory | ![]() |
-8 | -4 | 18 | 63 | 80 | 69 | 68 | 280 |
![]() |
3. | 4 | Stenson, Henrik | ![]() |
-8 | -1 | 18 | 68 | 74 | 67 | 71 | 280 |
![]() |
6. | 8 | Goosen, Retief | -7 | -2 | 18 | 69 | 70 | 72 | 70 | 281 | |
![]() |
7. | 3 | Kaymer, Martin | -6 | +2 | 18 | 69 | 71 | 68 | 74 | 282 | |
![]() |
7. | 8 | O’Hair, Sean | -6 | -1 | 18 | 67 | 72 | 72 | 71 | 282 | |
![]() |
7. | 18 | Rock, Robert | ![]() |
-6 | -3 | 18 | 68 | 78 | 67 | 69 | 282 |
![]() |
7. | 8 | Watney, Nick | ![]() |
-6 | -1 | 18 | 67 | 73 | 71 | 71 | 282 |
![]() |
11. | 26 | Donald, Luke | ![]() |
-5 | -3 | 18 | 73 | 72 | 69 | 69 | 283 |
![]() |
11. | 26 | Overton, Jeff | ![]() |
-5 | -3 | 18 | 73 | 69 | 72 | 69 | 283 |
![]() |
11. | 41 | Quiros, Alvaro | -5 | -5 | 18 | 72 | 70 | 74 | 67 | 283 | |
![]() |
14. | 52 | Fowler, Rickie | ![]() |
-4 | -5 | 18 | 79 | 67 | 71 | 67 | 284 |
![]() |
14. | 12 | Garcia, Sergio | -4 | E | 18 | 71 | 71 | 70 | 72 | 284 | |
![]() |
14. | 18 | Garrido, Ignacio | ![]() |
-4 | -1 | 18 | 69 | 71 | 73 | 71 | 284 |
![]() |
14. | 12 | Holmes, Jb | -4 | E | 18 | 70 | 72 | 70 | 72 | 284 | |
![]() |
14. | 12 | Jeong, Jin | -4 | E | 18 | 68 | 70 | 74 | 72 | 284 | |
![]() |
14. | 7 | Johnson, Dustin | -4 | +2 | 18 | 69 | 72 | 69 | 74 | 284 | |
![]() |
14. | 12 | Karlsson, Robert | ![]() |
-4 | E | 18 | 69 | 71 | 72 | 72 | 284 |
![]() |
14. | 26 | Lehman, Tom | ![]() |
-4 | -2 | 18 | 71 | 68 | 75 | 70 | 284 |
![]() |
14. | 26 | Schwartzel, Charl | -4 | -2 | 18 | 71 | 75 | 68 | 70 | 284 | |
![]() |
23. | 26 | Gallacher, Stephen | ![]() |
-3 | -1 | 18 | 71 | 73 | 70 | 71 | 285 |
![]() |
23. | 52 | Immelman, Trevor | -3 | -4 | 18 | 68 | 74 | 75 | 68 | 285 | |
![]() |
23. | 38 | McDowell, Graeme | -3 | -2 | 18 | 71 | 68 | 76 | 70 | 285 | |
![]() |
23. | 18 | Woods, Tiger | -3 | E | 18 | 67 | 73 | 73 | 72 | 285 | |
![]() |
27. | 38 | Allenby, Robert | -2 | -1 | 18 | 69 | 75 | 71 | 71 | 286 | |
![]() |
27. | 4 | Canizares, Alejandro | ![]() |
-2 | +5 | 18 | 67 | 71 | 71 | 77 | 286 |
![]() |
27. | 41 | Dredge, Bradley | -2 | -2 | 18 | 66 | 76 | 74 | 70 | 286 | |
![]() |
27. | 41 | Ishikawa, Ryo | -2 | -2 | 18 | 68 | 73 | 75 | 70 | 286 | |
![]() |
27. | 18 | Jimenez, Miguel Angel | -2 | +1 | 18 | 72 | 67 | 74 | 73 | 286 | |
![]() |
27. | 52 | Kuchar, Matt | -2 | -3 | 18 | 72 | 74 | 71 | 69 | 286 | |
![]() |
27. | 65 | Molinari, Edoardo | -2 | -4 | 18 | 69 | 76 | 73 | 68 | 286 | |
![]() |
27. | 26 | Na, Kevin | ![]() |
-2 | E | 18 | 70 | 74 | 70 | 72 | 286 |
![]() |
27. | 26 | Scott, Adam | ![]() |
-2 | E | 18 | 72 | 70 | 72 | 72 | 286 |
![]() |
27. | 41 | Siem, Marcel | -2 | -2 | 18 | 67 | 75 | 74 | 70 | 286 | |
![]() |
37. | 18 | Fisher, Ross | ![]() |
-1 | +2 | 18 | 68 | 77 | 68 | 74 | 287 |
![]() |
37. | 18 | Hanson, Peter | -1 | +2 | 18 | 66 | 73 | 74 | 74 | 287 | |
![]() |
37. | 41 | Kjeldsen, Soren | -1 | -1 | 18 | 72 | 74 | 70 | 71 | 287 | |
![]() |
37. | 12 | Lowry, Shane | -1 | +3 | 18 | 68 | 73 | 71 | 75 | 287 | |
![]() |
37. | 41 | Mahan, Hunter | ![]() |
-1 | -1 | 18 | 69 | 76 | 71 | 71 | 287 |
![]() |
37. | 52 | Moriarty, Colm | ![]() |
-1 | -2 | 18 | 72 | 73 | 72 | 70 | 287 |
![]() |
37. | 52 | Singh, Vijay | -1 | -2 | 18 | 68 | 73 | 76 | 70 | 287 | |
![]() |
44. | 8 | Barnes, Ricky | E | +5 | 18 | 68 | 71 | 72 | 77 | 288 | |
![]() |
44. | 52 | Clarke, Darren | E | -1 | 18 | 70 | 70 | 77 | 71 | 288 | |
![]() |
44. | 26 | Van Pelt, Bo | ![]() |
E | +2 | 18 | 69 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 288 |
![]() |
44. | 18 | Villegas, Camilo | ![]() |
E | +3 | 18 | 68 | 75 | 70 | 75 | 288 |
![]() |
48. | 38 | Cink, Stewart | +1 | +2 | 18 | 70 | 74 | 71 | 74 | 289 | |
![]() |
48. | 41 | Daly, John | +1 | +1 | 18 | 66 | 76 | 74 | 73 | 289 | |
![]() |
48. | 52 | Dyson, Simon | +1 | E | 18 | 69 | 75 | 73 | 72 | 289 | |
![]() |
48. | 18 | Glover, Lucas | +1 | +4 | 18 | 67 | 76 | 70 | 76 | 289 | |
![]() |
48. | 52 | Kim, Kyung-Tae | ![]() |
+1 | E | 18 | 70 | 74 | 73 | 72 | 289 |
![]() |
48. | 26 | Mickelson, Phil | +1 | +3 | 18 | 73 | 71 | 70 | 75 | 289 | |
![]() |
48. | 52 | Senden, John | ![]() |
+1 | E | 18 | 68 | 76 | 73 | 72 | 289 |
![]() |
55. | 72 | Chia, Danny | +2 | -2 | 18 | 69 | 77 | 74 | 70 | 290 | |
![]() |
55. | 41 | Khan, Simon | +2 | +2 | 18 | 74 | 69 | 73 | 74 | 290 | |
![]() |
55. | 26 | Marino, Steve | ![]() |
+2 | +4 | 18 | 69 | 76 | 69 | 76 | 290 |
![]() |
55. | 41 | Scotland, Zane | +2 | +2 | 18 | 70 | 74 | 72 | 74 | 290 | |
![]() |
55. | 41 | Stricker, Steve | ![]() |
+2 | +2 | 18 | 71 | 74 | 71 | 74 | 290 |
![]() |
60. | 72 | Day, Jason | +3 | -1 | 18 | 71 | 74 | 75 | 71 | 291 | |
![]() |
60. | 41 | Leishman, Marc | ![]() |
+3 | +3 | 18 | 73 | 71 | 72 | 75 | 291 |
![]() |
60. | 52 | Pernice Jr, Tom | +3 | +2 | 18 | 72 | 74 | 71 | 74 | 291 | |
![]() |
60. | 72 | Poulter, Ian | ![]() |
+3 | -1 | 18 | 71 | 73 | 76 | 71 | 291 |
![]() |
60. | 65 | Senior, Peter | ![]() |
+3 | +1 | 18 | 73 | 71 | 74 | 73 | 291 |
![]() |
60. | 65 | Slocum, Heath | ![]() |
+3 | +1 | 18 | 71 | 74 | 73 | 73 | 291 |
![]() |
60. | 52 | Taniguchi, Toru | ![]() |
+3 | +2 | 18 | 70 | 70 | 77 | 74 | 291 |
![]() |
60. | 52 | Yang, Y.E. | +3 | +2 | 18 | 67 | 74 | 76 | 74 | 291 | |
![]() |
68. | 26 | Andersson Hed, Fredrik | ![]() |
+4 | +6 | 18 | 67 | 74 | 73 | 78 | 292 |
![]() |
68. | 69 | Miyase, Hirofumi | +4 | +1 | 18 | 71 | 75 | 73 | 73 | 292 | |
![]() |
68. | 69 | Montgomerie, Colin | ![]() |
+4 | +1 | 18 | 74 | 71 | 74 | 73 | 292 |
![]() |
68. | 65 | Tiley, Steven | ![]() |
+4 | +2 | 18 | 66 | 79 | 73 | 74 | 292 |
![]() |
72. | 52 | Coltart, Andrew | +5 | +4 | 18 | 66 | 77 | 74 | 76 | 293 | |
![]() |
73. | 26 | Calcavecchia, Mark | ![]() |
+6 | +8 | 18 | 70 | 67 | 77 | 80 | 294 |
![]() |
74. | 76 | Aiken, Thomas | ![]() |
+7 | +2 | 18 | 71 | 73 | 77 | 74 | 295 |
![]() |
74. | 77 | S Johnson, Richard | +7 | +1 | 18 | 73 | 73 | 76 | 73 | 295 | |
![]() |
76. | 72 | Johnson, Zach | ![]() |
+8 | +4 | 18 | 72 | 74 | 74 | 76 | 296 |
![]() |
76. | 69 | Verplank, Scott | ![]() |
+8 | +5 | 18 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 77 | 296 |


PEBBLE BEACH, Calif. – You could almost see tendrils of smoke coming out Ernie Els’ ears as he marched out of the scoring trailer and through assembled media at the end of Sunday’s U.S. Open.
Witnesses testifying against the mob don’t make more determined exits from courthouses.
“He wants [a major championship] really badly,” said Chubby Chandler, his agent. “That’s his 31st top 10 in a major. Pretty amazing.”
And immensely aggravating.
Tiger Woods stopped to face the inquisition in the media bullpen behind the 18th green at Pebble Beach, but there was frustration of his own. Woods recounted bad decisions at the sixth, 10th and 12th holes that he believes cost him a chance to win his 15th major championship.
“You take away those three mental errors, and I’m right there, I’m tied for the lead,” Woods said.
Phil Mickelson staggered away lamenting his chance to win his first U.S. Open.
“Obviously, I wanted to win,” Mickelson said. “I had opportunities.”
Northern Ireland’s Graeme McDowell winning the U.S. Open to become the first European to win the title in 40 years wasn’t the stunning upset here on the craggy shores of Carmel Bay. It was that three of the titans of this era failed to capitalize on terrific opportunities.
McDowell finished a shot ahead of France’s Gregory Havret to win.

History will note that the three most decorated players of this era kept backing up when circumstances begged them to step forward.
Elsfinished third two shots back with Mickelson and Woods tied for fourth three back.
If you wondered if all those twentysomethings winning is a sign that a new era is dawning, this U.S. Open adds to your suspicions.
Without Woods at his best, the game seems as wide open as this U.S. Open was going to the back nine.
That doesn’t necessarily mean we’re entering an exciting new era of golf.
If the back nine is where the Masters begins, it’s where the U.S. Open ends, at least at Pebble Beach on this gray and dreary ending.
McDowell didn’t win this title so much as everyone else lost it.
Apologies to McDowell, because that’s immensely unfair to him, but that’s how this crazy Sunday felt with so many of the game’s best players squandering chances.
There was a terrific moment at the fourth tee box early in the day.
That’s where Woods set up to play under the large leaderboard there. It’s where he first got to see that Dustin Johnson was falling apart and turning this championship into a free-for-all.
With Johnson making triple bogey behind him, Woods could see he was now within three shots of the lead. So were Els and Mickelson.
Pebble Beach crackled with spectacular possibilities, but that’s what made this finish so unsatisfying.
The disappointment wasn’t in seeing McDowell win. It was in seeing three players as gifted as Woods, Mickelson and Els fail to challenge him. The three of them combined to make two birdies on the back nine.
Mickelson birdied the first hole, but he seemed to lose momentum failing to capitalize after smashing his tee shot to the fringe of the fourth green, a 325-yard par 4. He three putted for par.
“That was frustrating,” Mickelson said.
Almost as frustrating as failing to make a single birdie on the back nine.
“All I had to do was shoot even par in the back, and I’m in a playoff,” Mickelson said.
Woods was paired with Havret, where we saw the strongest evidence yet that Woods no longer intimidates opponents. Havret schooled Woods on the front nine, playing precision and almost error-free golf, making the turn in 1 under for the day. Woods bogeyed four of his first eight holes.
“This course baits you into being aggressive,” Woods said.
Woods took the bait too often. His swing was too loose under Sunday pressure.
Els’ putting continues to be a problem under pressure. His stroke’s tentative and short and unreliable and that doesn’t bode well for his dream of adding to his two U.S. Open titles and British Open title.
Was the setup too difficult? Tom Watson said it was difficult but fair.
Even McDowell was surprised he wasn’t pushed by this era’s proven stars.
“I was surprised that Gregory Havret was the guy closest to me,” McDowell said. “No disrespect to Gregory, he’s a great player, but when you have Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson and Ernie Els obviously there, you’re not expecting Gregory Havret to be the guy you’ve got to fend off.”
That pretty much summed up this Sunday at Pebble Beach.
THE OPEN: Louis Oosthuizen WINS the OPEN GOLF Championship




